Posts

From PDF to XML: What Publishers Lose and Gain in Conversion

Image
From PDF to XML: What Publishers Lose and Gain in Conversion From PDF to XML: What Publishers Lose and Gain in Conversion For decades, PDFs have been the industry standard for sharing and archiving content. While they preserve layouts and ensure consistency across devices, modern publishing demands more than static documents. As publishers transition toward XML-first workflows, understanding what is lost and gained during PDF-to-XML conversion becomes essential for long-term scalability. What Publishers Lose During PDF-to-XML Conversion PDFs are designed for presentation, not content intelligence. Converting them into XML often means moving away from fixed layouts and visual formatting. Publishers may lose: Exact page-based formatting and typography. Manual design elements embedded within the document. Static structures that are difficult to adapt across platforms. Legacy workflows built around print-first production. Complex elements such as tables, equations, footnotes, and multi-co...
Post a Comment
Read more

When to Use LaTeX vs InDesign for STM Content

Image
  Scientific, Technical, and Medical (STM) publishing demands precision, consistency, and scalability. Choosing between LaTeX and Adobe InDesign is not simply a design decision; it directly impacts production efficiency, content accuracy, and publishing timelines. Understanding where each platform excels helps publishers build smarter workflows. LaTeX: The Standard for Complex Scientific Publishing LaTeX is widely used in academic and research publishing because it handles highly structured content with ease. Journals and textbooks containing mathematical equations, chemical formulas, tables, citations, and cross-references benefit significantly from LaTeX-based workflows. LaTeX is ideal when your publication includes: Mathematical and statistical equations. Research papers and journal articles. Technical books with extensive references. Automated citation and bibliography management. XML-first and digital-first publishing workflows. For STM publishers managing large volumes of s...
Post a Comment
Read more

When to Use LaTeX vs InDesign for STM Content

Image
  Scientific, Technical, and Medical (STM) publishing demands precision, consistency, and scalability. Choosing between LaTeX and Adobe InDesign is not simply a design decision; it directly impacts production efficiency, content accuracy, and publishing timelines. Understanding where each platform excels helps publishers build smarter workflows. LaTeX: The Standard for Complex Scientific Publishing LaTeX is widely used in academic and research publishing because it handles highly structured content with ease. Journals and textbooks containing mathematical equations, chemical formulas, tables, citations, and cross-references benefit significantly from LaTeX-based workflows. LaTeX is ideal when your publication includes: Mathematical and statistical equations. Research papers and journal articles. Technical books with extensive references. Automated citation and bibliography management. XML-first and digital-first publishing workflows. For STM publishers managing large volumes of s...
Post a Comment
Read more

EPUB3 and Interactive eBook Creation for Asia-Pacific Publishers Based in Singapore

Image
  Readers across Asia-Pacific are mobile-first, and increasingly, they expect more from an eBook than a static page that happens to be digital. Interactive elements, embedded media, navigable references, fixed layouts that actually hold up across devices, these aren’t extras anymore. They’re what readers in the region have come to expect by default. For publishers based in Singapore, sitting at the center of a fast-growing regional market with English-language workflows and connections across APAC, this creates an opening, but also a production challenge most teams haven’t fully solved yet. Here’s where it gets complicated. EPUB3 supports interactivity, embedded video, audio, scripted content, fixed and reflowable layouts, but building these well requires a different skill set than traditional eBook conversion. A reflowable EPUB that handles a math-heavy STM title correctly is a different problem than a fixed-layout children’s book with interactive elements, which is again differ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Choose an Outsourcing Partner for Academic Book Production in Canada

Image
  Canadian academic publishers are under more pressure than usual right now. The ADA Title II deadline in April 2026 means accessibility can’t be an afterthought, production timelines keep tightening, and budgets aren’t growing to match. For publishers considering outsourcing book production for the first time, or rethinking an existing vendor relationship, here’s what actually separates a reliable partner from a risky one. Can they handle the full pipeline, not just one piece of it? Copyediting, typesetting, XML conversion, and accessibility output are usually treated as separate vendor relationships, which means every handoff between them is a place where something gets missed. The publishers with the smoothest production cycles work with a partner who runs all of it as one workflow, so accessibility metadata gets built alongside the XML, not bolted on six months later. This is exactly how we’ve structured our production process, because we’ve seen what happens when it isn’t. D...
Post a Comment
Read more

Full-Service Journal Production for Netherlands Publishers: From Copyediting to Accessible XML Output

Image
  Most journal production workflows weren’t designed as one workflow. They were built piece by piece, a copyediting vendor here, a typesetting partner there, XML conversion handled separately, and accessibility bolted on at the end because a deadline made it urgent. For Netherlands-based STM and academic publishers , sitting at the center of Europe’s open access transition with Elsevier’s global headquarters in the country, that fragmented approach is becoming a liability rather than just an inefficiency. Here’s the problem with handling each stage separately: every handoff between vendors is a place where things get lost. A copyeditor flags a formatting issue that the typesetter doesn’t see. The XML conversion team tags content correctly, but nobody updates the accessibility metadata afterward. Each piece works, but the seams between them are where journals lose time, and where compliance gaps quietly form. We built our journal production process specifically to remove those seams...
Post a Comment
Read more

EPUB3 Accessibility Remediation: What Elsevier-Affiliated and Independent Dutch Publishers Need to Know

Image
  The European Accessibility Act is no longer a deadline on the horizon, it’s been in force since June 2025, and the EPUB files in your catalogue are either compliant or they’re a liability. For publishers based in the Netherlands, home to Elsevier’s global headquarters and a dense network of academic and STM publishers, this isn’t an abstract compliance exercise. It’s a backlist problem. Most publishers have years, sometimes decades, of EPUB titles that were never built with WCAG 2.1 AA in mind. Here’s what remediation actually involves, and where most projects get stuck. It’s not just alt text. The most common misconception we run into is that accessibility remediation means adding image descriptions and calling it done. Real EPUB3 remediation covers reading order, navigation landmarks, semantic structure, MathML for equations, and table markup, all of which require someone to actually understand the original content, not just run it through an automated checker. Metadata is h...
Post a Comment
Read more